vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $213.6M, roughly 1.6× Vital Farms, Inc.). FULTON FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs 7.6%, a 20.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vital Farms, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Vital Farms, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.2% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Vital Tomosi Dairy Limited is a dairy processing company in Uganda. The company is a joint venture between Vital Capital Fund, "an impact investing fund primarily focused on Sub-Saharan Africa", and "Tomosi Dairy Farms, a Ugandan producer of dairy products".
FULT vs VITL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $213.6M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.9% | 54.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $198.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $184.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $162.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $147.4M |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $16.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $48.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $351.3M |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $518.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $133.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $351.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $331.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $309.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $269.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $238.4M |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | $518.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $481.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $430.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $376.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | $359.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $344.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $320.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-32.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 17.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-48.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $-761.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $16.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -15.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FULT
Segment breakdown not available.
VITL
| Eggs And Egg Related Products | $205.8M | 96% |
| Butter And Butter Related Products | $7.7M | 4% |
