vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR) and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $853.2M, roughly 1.8× Kontoor Brands, Inc.). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -5.0%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs 4.2%). Kontoor Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.8M vs $-315.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is an American telecommunications company with a fiber-optic network and cloud-based services owned by Verizon. It was previously known as Citizens Utilities Co., Citizens Communications Co., and Frontier Communications Corp.
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
FYBR vs KTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $853.2M |
| Net Profit | $-76.0M | $36.9M |
| Gross Margin | 64.3% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.0% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 27.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.3% | -47.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $853.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $658.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $622.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $699.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $670.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $606.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $631.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.4B | — |
| Q3 25 | $-76.0M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-123.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.0M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-123.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | $59.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $17.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | 64.3% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.2% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.2% | 43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.4% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | 63.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | 8.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.49 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.49 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.0M | $82.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7B | $529.6M |
| Total Assets | $21.6B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.0M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $750.0M | $334.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $269.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $224.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $215.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $735.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $745.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $749.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $779.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $529.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $498.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $426.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $400.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $356.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $367.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $387.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.3B | — |
| Q3 25 | $21.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 23 | $20.7B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $504.0M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-315.0M | $55.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.5% | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 53.4% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4B | $228.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.0M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $519.0M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $294.0M | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.0M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $335.0M | $56.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $296.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-315.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-368.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-498.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.0M | $129.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-252.0M | $92.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-331.0M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-33.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -20.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | -2.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | 53.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | 23.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 335.00× | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 23 | 17.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FYBR
| Consumer | $826.0M | 54% |
| Business And Wholesale | $707.0M | 46% |
KTB
| International Member | $292.0M | 34% |
| CTC Triangle B.V | $192.7M | 23% |
| Lee Segment | $186.7M | 22% |
| Helly Hansen Segment | $185.9M | 22% |
