vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and G III APPAREL GROUP LTD (GIII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $988.6M, roughly 1.3× G III APPAREL GROUP LTD). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 8.2%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, G III APPAREL GROUP LTD's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
G III Apparel Group is a global fashion company that designs, sources, manufactures, markets and distributes apparel, footwear, and accessories under a range of owned and licensed well-known brands. It serves department stores, specialty retailers, and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe, and other key global markets, catering to casual, sportswear, and premium fashion consumer segments.
GEN vs GIII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $988.6M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $80.6M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -29.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $988.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $583.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $839.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $644.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $609.7M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 42.5% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $1.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $2.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $184.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $257.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $181.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $104.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $414.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $508.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $213.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $402.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $402.7M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | 0.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-97.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-106.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $367.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $-97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $333.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $-111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $-106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $64.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $323.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $32.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | -11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | -1.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 6.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 6.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | -0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 7.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
GIII
| Proprietary Brands | $498.1M | 50% |
| Licensed Brands | $479.2M | 48% |
| Retail Segment | $45.7M | 5% |
