vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO (GPK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 3.4%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Graphic Packaging International is a Fortune 500 corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It designs and manufactures packaging solutions for commercial products. GPI manufactures paperboard and folding cartons for a wide range of popular consumer goods, particularly beverages and packaged food. The company operates paperboard mills in Kalamazoo, Michigan; Macon, Georgia; Middletown, Ohio; Prosperity, South Carolina; Texarkana, Texas; and West Monroe, Louisiana, that use recycled...
GEN vs GPK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $71.0M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 14.1% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $165.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $190.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 21.2% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 14.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $261.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $11.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 1.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $261.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $129.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $125.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $10.8B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | 1.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | 1.75× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $521.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $521.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $-174.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $489.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $161.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 7.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | -1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
GPK
| Americas Paperboard Packaging | $1.4B | 68% |
| Other | $667.0M | 32% |
