vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $692.4M, roughly 1.8× OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 5.2%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
GEN vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.
