vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $809.5M, roughly 1.5× Construction Partners, Inc.). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 2.1%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Construction Partners, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (44.1% vs 28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Construction Partners, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (47.6% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Alexander Construction Company was a Palm Springs, California, residential development company that built over 2,200 houses in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County, California, between 1955 and 1965.
GEN vs ROAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $809.5M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $17.2M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 6.2% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 44.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 663.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $809.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $899.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $779.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $571.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $561.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $538.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $517.8M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 6.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $969.1M |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $56.3M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $515.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $969.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $912.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $853.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $807.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $811.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $573.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $552.9M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $82.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $47.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $186.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $112.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $55.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $34.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $19.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 13.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
ROAD
Segment breakdown not available.
