vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($49.7M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.2× Namib Minerals). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-5.6M).
Gen Korean BBQ is an American chain of all-you-can-eat Korean barbecue restaurants mainly concentrated around the Western U.S. It opened in 2011, and has since grown to 43 locations as of 2024.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
GENK vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $49.7M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -3.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -821.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-566.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-261.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-301.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-206.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $277.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $496.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $259.9M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $259.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $232.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-426.0K | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.6M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.5% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-426.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-586.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.08× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
