vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $37.8M, roughly 1.1× Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
NAMM vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
