vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $649.1M, roughly 1.7× GRIFFON CORP). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 9.9%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRIFFON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 1.7%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
GFF vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.9M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.1M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.28 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.2M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.84× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
