vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global-E Online Ltd. (GLBE) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global-E Online Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.5M vs $327.6M, roughly 1.9× Navios Maritime Partners L.P.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs 0.9%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Global-E Online Ltd. operates a leading cross-border e-commerce enablement platform that helps direct-to-consumer brands and retail enterprises expand their international sales reach. It offers end-to-end services including localized checkout, payment processing, customs clearance, logistics coordination, and duty calculation, serving clients across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
GLBE vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $625.5M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.8M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $625.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.8M | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $189.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $313.9M | $342.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $280.7M |
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-77.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-54.5M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $112.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $118.2M |
| Q3 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 88.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 92.3% |
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.4% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 42.1% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $251.4M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $933.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $251.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.2M | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $207.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.8M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $181.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $261.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $163.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $1.1B |
| Q3 25 | $933.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $884.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $869.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $886.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.0B |
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
