vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillman Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($370.1M vs $257.0M, roughly 1.4× GCI Liberty, Inc.). Hillman Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -150.6%, a 149.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. GCI Liberty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.0M vs $-34.3M).
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Hillman Solutions is an American hardware manufacturing, distribution and consumer fabrication services company.
GLIBA vs HLMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $370.1M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | 1.9% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $365.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $424.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $402.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $359.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $349.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $393.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $379.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-317.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $27.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | $714.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $37.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $714.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $668.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | $683.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | $683.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $713.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $691.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $730.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $732.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $-34.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | -9.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $22.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-655.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-34.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
