vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $257.0M, roughly 1.3× GCI Liberty, Inc.). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -150.6%, a 167.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. GCI Liberty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.0M vs $-90.4M).
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
GLIBA vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLIBA
Segment breakdown not available.
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
