vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $257.0M, roughly 1.3× GCI Liberty, Inc.). TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs -150.6%, a 173.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
GLIBA vs TCBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $324.0M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $73.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 56.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $324.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $307.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -63.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | $2.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | $878.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $620.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | $620.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | $620.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $660.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $660.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $660.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $32.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $360.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $368.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $480.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $332.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $347.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $317.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 106.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 180.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 253.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
