vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) and HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. (HCWC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.4× Gossamer Bio, Inc.). HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. runs the higher net margin — -8.9% vs -342.3%, a 333.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gossamer Bio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel therapeutics for patients with serious immunology, inflammation and oncology conditions. It advances a pipeline of proprietary product candidates across multiple clinical phases, primarily serving healthcare markets in North America and other global regions.
GOSS vs HCWC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.8M | $18.7M |
| Net Profit | $-47.2M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | -333.6% | -7.6% |
| Net Margin | -342.3% | -8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 47.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.8M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0 | — |
| Q4 25 | $-47.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-48.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-339.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-712.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-40.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -333.6% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -369.4% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -342.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -362.7% | -6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.9M | $3.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-122.8M | $7.3M |
| Total Assets | $172.2M | $33.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $354.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $328.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-122.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $104.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $259.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $347.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-48.3M | $-855.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-927.1K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $675.4K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-48.3M | $-855.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.2M | $-308.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-34.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-927.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-351.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $988.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $965.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GOSS
Segment breakdown not available.
HCWC
| Retail Grocery | $17.1M | 91% |
| Food Service Restaurant | $1.7M | 9% |
