vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. (HCWC) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.4× Laird Superfood, Inc.). HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. runs the higher net margin — -8.9% vs -13.2%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
HCWC vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.7M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -8.9% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-339.4K | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-712.4K | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.8% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.4% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.4% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $33.5M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.4M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-855.1K | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-927.1K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $675.4K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-855.1K | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-308.7K | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-927.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-351.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $988.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $965.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCWC
| Retail Grocery | $17.1M | 91% |
| Food Service Restaurant | $1.7M | 9% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
