vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and WEST BANCORPORATION INC (WTBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEST BANCORPORATION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.0× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). WEST BANCORPORATION INC runs the higher net margin — 39.2% vs -112.0%, a 151.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 16.6%). WEST BANCORPORATION INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.4M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, WEST BANCORPORATION INC's revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
West Bancorporation Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Midwest, primarily serving markets across Iowa and Minnesota. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, business lending, and wealth management solutions for individual consumers, small-to-medium enterprises, and local organizational clients.
GPUS vs WTBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $10.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | 50.0% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | 39.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | 34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $362.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $270.7M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $471.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $345.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $270.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $240.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $237.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $223.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $12.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | 46.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $79.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 35.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | 65.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 125.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
WTBA
Segment breakdown not available.
