vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.1M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.1× Goosehead Insurance, Inc.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs -12.5%, a 21.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Goosehead Insurance, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.2% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
GSHD vs OLPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $105.1M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $-13.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.6% | -12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 204.0% | -48.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $105.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $114.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $106.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.6M | $97.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.0M | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | $103.9M |
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $465.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.7% |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.7M | $318.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $352.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-121.3M | $879.4M |
| Total Assets | $392.8M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4M | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $289.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | $580.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $538.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $507.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | $352.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.0M | $352.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.8M | $351.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.3M | $649.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $650.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | $651.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $653.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.5M | $879.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.0M | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.6M | $874.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.5M | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $874.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $879.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $863.3M |
| Q1 26 | $392.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.87× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | 0.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 0.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $32.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $32.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $58.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $16.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $49.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $16.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.1% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 15.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.06× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.61× | -6.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 2.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 2.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |
