vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GSI TECHNOLOGY INC (GSIT) and PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PURE CYCLE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.5× GSI TECHNOLOGY INC). PURE CYCLE CORP runs the higher net margin — 50.0% vs -49.7%, a 99.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PURE CYCLE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.8% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PURE CYCLE CORP's revenue compounded faster (69.0% CAGR vs 8.6%).
Triad GSI is an American voting machine vendor based in Xenia, Ohio. Their main products are election-related computer hardware and software for counting ballots, as well as voter registration.
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
GSIT vs PCYO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $9.1M |
| Net Profit | $-3.0M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | 68.4% |
| Operating Margin | -113.7% | 48.0% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | 50.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.2% | 58.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.0% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $809.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.3M | $118.0K |
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.8% | 67.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.0% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.3% | 64.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.6% | 55.6% |
| Q4 25 | -113.7% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.5% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.6% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.7% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -74.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -122.7% | 62.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -87.6% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.4% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.3% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -74.4% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.0% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -83.9% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.16 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $70.7M | $17.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $83.6M | $147.5M |
| Total Assets | $98.5M | $168.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $70.7M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.1M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.4M | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.4M | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $134.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.9M | $133.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.3M | $129.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $123.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.0M | $120.4M |
| Q4 25 | $98.5M | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $151.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $149.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $147.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $140.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | $135.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.9M | $-979.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -134.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $-979.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-887.0K | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-503.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $892.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-457.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-906.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -134.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -66.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -76.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -92.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -139.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.96× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSIT
| Distribution | $5.6M | 92% |
| Other | $459.0K | 8% |
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
