vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BeOne Medicines Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.4× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 4.4%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BeOne Medicines Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.8% vs -2.5%). BeOne Medicines Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($379.8M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, BeOne Medicines Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (41.2% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
BeOne Medicines Ltd.ONCEarnings & Financial Report
BeOne Medicines, formerly known as BeiGene, Ltd. is a multinational oncology company. It specializes in the development of drugs for cancer treatment.
GTLS vs ONC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $66.5M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 12.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 32.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 143.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $929.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $751.7M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $66.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $-151.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $-121.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $-120.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $-251.2M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 90.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 86.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 87.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 85.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 85.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 85.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 83.4% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -33.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $836.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $836.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $417.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $379.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 25.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 6.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $941.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $417.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $402.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $188.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $-95.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $-308.6M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $379.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $354.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $219.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $-205.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-465.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -22.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -61.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 6.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 2.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 34.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
ONC
Segment breakdown not available.