vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -5.5%, a 10.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -2.5%). Take-Two Interactive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.2M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
GTLS vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $12.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.
