vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.1× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -20.7%, a 21.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-47.9M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
HCM vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $404.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.9% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $560.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
