vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. (HCWC) and Massimo Group (MAMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Massimo Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.0M vs $18.7M, roughly 1.1× HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP.). Massimo Group runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -8.9%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
HCWC vs MAMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.7M | $21.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -8.9% | 9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 215.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-339.4K | $77.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-712.4K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.8% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.1% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.4% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.7% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $5.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $23.7M |
| Total Assets | $33.5M | $51.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.1M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.4M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $46.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-855.1K | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-927.1K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $675.4K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-855.1K | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-308.7K | $633.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-637.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-927.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-351.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $988.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $965.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-741.4K |
| Q4 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCWC
| Retail Grocery | $17.1M | 91% |
| Food Service Restaurant | $1.7M | 9% |
MAMO
Segment breakdown not available.
