vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $235.9M, roughly 4.7× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 3.4%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -13.8%).
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
HHH vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $235.9M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 121.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.6% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $235.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 121.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.3M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-224.9M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.3M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.5M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.4M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.1M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.7M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -119.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.35× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.83× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
