vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.7× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 2.2%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 5.2%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
HIPO vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.4M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.4% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.3M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.5M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.2M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.5M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.3% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.7% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.4% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.2% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.91 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.81 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.64 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.3M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $436.1M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.3M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.7M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.9M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.9M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $436.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.6M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.53× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.8M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.6M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.2M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
