vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillman Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($370.1M vs $307.3M, roughly 1.2× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). Hillman Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -20.7%, a 19.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hillman Solutions Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.0% vs -0.2%). Hillman Solutions Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-34.3M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Hillman Solutions Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Hillman Solutions is an American hardware manufacturing, distribution and consumer fabrication services company.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
HLMN vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $370.1M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $370.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.1M | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.9M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.8M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $359.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.6M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.3M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $379.4M | $398.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-317.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 9.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.00 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $2.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.7M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $714.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | $714.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $668.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $683.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $713.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $691.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $592.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-34.3M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.3% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $22.1M | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-655.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.1M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $32.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.5M | $21.0M |
| Q1 26 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.57× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.17× | 0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HLMN
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
