vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Root, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($397.0M vs $370.1M, roughly 1.1× Hillman Solutions Corp.). On growth, Root, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.5% vs 3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Root, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Hillman Solutions is an American hardware manufacturing, distribution and consumer fabrication services company.
Root Insurance Company is an online car insurance company operating in the United States.
HLMN vs ROOT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $370.1M | $397.0M |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 21.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $370.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.1M | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.9M | $387.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.8M | $382.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $359.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.6M | $326.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.3M | $305.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $379.4M | $289.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-317.0K | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | $-7.8M |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | -2.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $1.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.00 | $1.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.7M | $669.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $714.1M | $200.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $284.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $669.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | $653.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $641.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $609.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | $599.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.8M | $674.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $667.2M |
| Q1 26 | $714.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $668.3M | $200.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $683.2M | $200.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.1M | $200.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $713.5M | $200.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $691.7M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.7M | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.1M | $300.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $284.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $265.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $244.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $228.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $151.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.62× | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | 1.98× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $206.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-34.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $22.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $206.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-655.0K | $26.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.1M | $195.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $62.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.5M | $62.4M |
| Q1 26 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | 2.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.57× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
