vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($253.4M vs $216.6M, roughly 1.2× HighPeak Energy, Inc.). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs -23.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs -13.2%).
Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company serves over 7 million customers in the eastern United States. In 2024 it ranked as the 141st largest company in the United States – its highest-ever placement on the Fortune 500 list.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
HPK vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $216.6M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $-25.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | -11.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -23.3% | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -380.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $216.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.9M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.4M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $257.4M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.6M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.3M | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.8M | $118.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.1% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.8% | 29.0% |
| Q4 25 | -11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $162.1M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $162.1M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.9M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.9M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.6M | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.6M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.9M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.4M | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $532.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $501.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $93.1M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.2M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.1M | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.5M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.1M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.3M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.4M | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.39× | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.32× | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.81× | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.63× | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HPK
| Crude Oil Sales | $152.1M | 70% |
| Natural Gas And NGL Sales | $60.8M | 28% |
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.
