vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HighPeak Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($216.6M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.6× STRATASYS LTD.). HighPeak Energy, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -11.6% vs -40.6%, a 29.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STRATASYS LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.2% vs -23.3%). Over the past eight quarters, STRATASYS LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (-7.4% CAGR vs -13.2%).
Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company serves over 7 million customers in the eastern United States. In 2024 it ranked as the 141st largest company in the United States – its highest-ever placement on the Fortune 500 list.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
HPK vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $216.6M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-25.2M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -11.6% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.3% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -380.7% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.9M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.4M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $257.4M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.6M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.3M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.8M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.1% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.7% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.8% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | -11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $162.1M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $162.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.9M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.9M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.6M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.6M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.9M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.4M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $93.1M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.1M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.3M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.4M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.81× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HPK
| Crude Oil Sales | $152.1M | 70% |
| Natural Gas And NGL Sales | $60.8M | 28% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
