vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). Hubbell Incorporated runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs 14.3%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hubbell Incorporated posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 1.7%). Hubbell Incorporated produced more free cash flow last quarter ($388.8M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Hubbell Incorporated's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
HUBB vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.8M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.73 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.3M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
