vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rumble Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.1M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.3× i-80 Gold Corp.). Rumble Inc. runs the higher net margin — -120.8% vs -401.9%, a 281.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Rumble Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-31.7M vs $-39.2M).
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
IAUX vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $-85.6M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -291.6% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | -401.9% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-85.6M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.9M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.1M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.7% | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -171.4% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | -291.6% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.7% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -112.3% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -210.0% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -435.2% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | -401.9% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -130.8% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -108.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -293.3% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -374.5% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -570.8% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $346.8M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $703.4M | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.9M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.8M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $174.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.0M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $703.4M | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $756.2M | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $782.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $659.0M | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.3M | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.2M | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -184.3% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.1% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.2M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.5M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.6M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.2M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.1M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.8M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | -184.3% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.1% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -206.7% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.1% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |