vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IBM (IBM) and RIO TINTO PLC (RIO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RIO TINTO PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8B vs $15.9B, roughly 1.9× IBM). RIO TINTO PLC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs 7.6%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RIO TINTO PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.6% vs 9.7%). RIO TINTO PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3B vs $2.2B).
International Business Machines Corporation, doing business as IBM, is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, and present in over 175 countries. It is a publicly traded company and one of the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. IBM is the largest industrial research organization in the world, with 19 research facilities across a dozen countries; for 29 consecutive years, from 1993 to 2021, it held the record for most annual U.S.
Rio Tinto Group is a British-Australian multinational mining company headquartered in London, England, and Melbourne, Australia. It was founded in 1873 when a group of British investors purchased a mine complex on the Río Tinto, in Huelva, Spain, from the Spanish government. It has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions and is today a major producer of commodities such as copper, iron ore, aluminium and lithium.
IBM vs RIO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.9B | $30.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $5.7B |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 18.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.7% | 14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.3% | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | $3.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $30.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | $26.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-330.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.90 | $3.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.31 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.11 | $3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $9.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $66.4B | $21.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1B | $67.0B |
| Total Assets | $156.2B | $128.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.01× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $66.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8B | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $33.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6B | $67.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.3B | $58.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $156.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.9B | $128.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.2B | $102.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.0% | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 24.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.25× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.2B | $11.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IBM
| Software | $7.1B | 45% |
| Consulting | $5.3B | 33% |
| Infrastructure | $3.3B | 21% |
| Financing | $200.0M | 1% |
RIO
Segment breakdown not available.
