vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP (TMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($194.8M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.6× IMAX CORP). TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 49.4% vs 0.5%, a 48.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (152.7% vs 35.1%). TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.9M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (63.6% CAGR vs 25.8%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Tompkins Financial Corporation is a small, diversified financial services company based in Ithaca, New York. It is the parent of the Tompkins Trust Company, as well as several other banks, an insurance agency, and a wealth management division.
IMAX vs TMP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $194.8M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $96.2M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 71.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 49.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 152.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 388.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $6.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $194.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $82.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $77.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $76.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $72.8M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 71.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 28.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 30.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 23.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $6.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $1.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $1.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $1.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $132.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $938.4M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $193.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $212.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $193.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $134.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $132.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $57.1M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $938.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $761.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $741.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $713.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $719.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $674.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $667.9M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $7.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $38.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $31.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 16.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 0.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $105.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $38.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $33.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $21.9M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 115.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 36.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 30.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 4.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 1.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
TMP
Segment breakdown not available.
