vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO) and US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
US Foods Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.8B vs $8.2B, roughly 1.2× IMPERIAL OIL LTD). IMPERIAL OIL LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs 1.9%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, US Foods Holding Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -10.5%). IMPERIAL OIL LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($938.8M vs $159.0M). Over the past eight quarters, US Foods Holding Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -4.2%).
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
US Foods Holding Corp. is an American food service distributor. It is the second-largest food service distributor in the U.S., after Sysco. The company supplies 250,000 locations including independent restaurants, chain restaurants, healthcare, hospitality, and educational institutions.
IMO vs USFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.2B | $9.8B |
| Net Profit | $359.2M | $184.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.5% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -59.8% | 178.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8B | $10.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $359.2M | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.5M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $692.8M | $224.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $940.2M | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.3M | $66.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.0M | $148.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.1M | $198.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $872.4M | $82.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $833.7M | $41.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.2B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $30.9B | $13.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $833.7M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $61.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $714.7M | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $405.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $858.5M | $267.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $16.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.9B | $4.8B |
| Q4 25 | $30.9B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4B | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.2B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0B | $13.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.0B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2B | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0B | $13.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.16× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | 0.95× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4B | $293.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $938.8M | $159.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.4% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.90× | 1.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.4B | $959.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $351.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $334.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $391.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $283.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $270.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $482.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $785.5M | $139.0M |
| Q4 25 | $938.8M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $944.6M | $236.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.6M | $257.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.2M | $307.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $997.2M | $178.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.7M | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.6M | $413.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $422.7M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.90× | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.34× | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.54× | 1.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 4.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.44× | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.90× | 1.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMO
Segment breakdown not available.
USFD
| Product One | $3.5B | 36% |
| Product Two | $1.7B | 17% |
| Product Three | $1.7B | 17% |
| Product Four | $985.0M | 10% |
| Product Five | $901.0M | 9% |
| Product Six | $580.0M | 6% |
| Product Seven | $485.0M | 5% |
