vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (INEO) and Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNEOVA Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8M vs $27.6M, roughly 1.1× Maison Solutions Inc.). INNEOVA Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -18.0%, a 18.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Maison Solutions Inc.MSSEarnings & Financial Report
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty home goods retail company that provides a diverse portfolio of stylish, affordably priced furniture, home decor items, and daily household products. Its primary market is the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China, serving mass consumers through both offline physical stores and online e-commerce channels.
INEO vs MSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $27.6M |
| Net Profit | $243.0K | $-5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -4.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1840.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.0K | $-287.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-256.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $700.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-549.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9M | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.2M | $11.6M |
| Total Assets | $52.6M | $75.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.26× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $775.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $445.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $355.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $588.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $73.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $77.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-301.0K | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-301.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INEO
Segment breakdown not available.
MSS
| Perishables | $14.4M | 52% |
| Nonperishables | $13.2M | 48% |
