vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERGROUP CORP (INTG) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERGROUP CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.3M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.1× DNA X, Inc.). INTERGROUP CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.8% vs -29.3%, a 38.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERGROUP CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Intergroup Corp is a diversified holding firm operating two core segments: real estate and hotel operations. It owns, manages and leases commercial and residential properties across the U.S., and runs limited-service hotels for leisure and business travelers.
INTG vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.3M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.5M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.8% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.8% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 155.6% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-535.0K | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-578.0K | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-398.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.0% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.9% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.7% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.26 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.44 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.5M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $233.2M | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-85.2M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $101.1M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.5M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $233.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-85.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.7M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-84.5M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-83.9M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-80.9M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-80.3M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-76.4M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $101.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.5M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.1M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.6M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.3M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0M | $42.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.0K | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-481.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $739.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-296.0K | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-854.0K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-781.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-481.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.8% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INTG
| Hotel Operations | $12.7M | 73% |
| Real Estate Operation | $4.6M | 27% |
SONM
Segment breakdown not available.
