vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP) and JOINT Corp (JYNT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $15.2M, roughly 1.7× JOINT Corp). JOINT Corp runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -5.7%, a 12.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JOINT Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs 2.1%). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5M vs $334.7K). Over the past eight quarters, IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -28.6%).
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
The Joint Corp is a leading operator and franchisor of chiropractic care clinics primarily serving the U.S. market. It offers accessible, affordable routine chiropractic services, membership-based care plans, and caters to consumers seeking non-invasive musculoskeletal pain management and wellness support.
ITP vs JYNT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.6M | $15.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $991.1K |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | -5.7% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.6% | 5510.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $991.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $855.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $93.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $967.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $17.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-77.7K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $947.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 78.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 90.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 90.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 90.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.0% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.6% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.35 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $23.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $152.0M | $15.1M |
| Total Assets | $175.7M | $61.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.8M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.3M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.3M | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.7M | $69.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.2M | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.2M | $80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.5M | $83.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $191.4M | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.5M | $85.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5M | $334.7K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.9% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 9.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.8M | $-1.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $868.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.9K | $-973.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $624.4K | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $334.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $363.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $668.3K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.4K | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.8% | -30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 532.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ITP
Segment breakdown not available.
JYNT
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.8M | 84% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.4M | 16% |