vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and J.Jill, Inc. (JILL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
J.Jill, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.5M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.2× JBG SMITH Properties). J.Jill, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -18.1%, a 24.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBG SMITH Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, J.Jill, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -2.9%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
JBGS vs JILL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $150.5M |
| Net Profit | $-23.0M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | -18.1% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.1% | -25.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $150.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $153.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $142.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $155.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $161.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $1.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $58.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $129.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $458.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $35.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $38.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $77.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $105.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $103.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $53.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $458.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $432.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $417.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $418.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $390.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $443.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $37.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
| Property rental | $105.9M | 83% |
| Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements | $17.2M | 13% |
| Other revenue | $4.5M | 4% |
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
