vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Life360, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($146.0M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.1× JBG SMITH Properties). Life360, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 88.8% vs -35.7%, a 124.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life360, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.4% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
JBGS vs LIF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $146.0M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 88.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | 1425.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $1.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $124.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $92.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $84.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 76.7% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | -8.2% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 88.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | -12.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $494.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $548.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $959.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $494.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $455.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $432.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $168.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $160.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | $73.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $548.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $391.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $366.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $376.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $326.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $959.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $787.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $753.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $455.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $427.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $405.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $318.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $86.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.