vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $123.5M, roughly 1.0× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -35.7%, a 41.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
JBGS vs LOCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $123.5M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | 9.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $123.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $125.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $114.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $120.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $122.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $6.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $291.1M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $606.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $291.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $282.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $274.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $265.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $248.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $256.3M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $606.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $602.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $596.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $590.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $592.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $590.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $598.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.31× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $13.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $25.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
