vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.0× JBG SMITH Properties). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
JBGS vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $113.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.9% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $157.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $334.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $334.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $709.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $746.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
