vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($183.1M vs $142.9M, roughly 1.3× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 13.3% vs -30.3%, a 43.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -1.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals is a publicly traded American speciality pharmaceutical company. It was incorporated in May 2004 and primarily develops, manufactures, and sells inhalation and intranasal products.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
AMPH vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $183.1M | $142.9M |
| Net Profit | $24.4M | $-43.2M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 13.3% | -30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.8% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.7% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.51 | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $183.1M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.8M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.4M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.5M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.5M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.4M | $143.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.8M | $144.5M |
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.2M | $-27.8M |
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.1% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.51 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.78 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.81 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $282.8M | $731.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $788.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.77× | 1.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.8M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $276.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $221.6M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.5M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.8M | $138.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.6M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $608.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $603.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.4M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $586.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $594.0M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $788.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $776.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $757.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $751.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $727.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $713.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.4M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.82× | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.88× | 1.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $32.9M | $140.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $121.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.9M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.6M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.1M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | $23.4M |
| Q4 25 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMPH
| Other Products | $62.4M | 34% |
| Baqsimi | $46.7M | 26% |
| Primatenemist | $27.9M | 15% |
| Epinephrine | $17.1M | 9% |
| Lidocaine | $14.9M | 8% |
| Glucagon | $14.1M | 8% |
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |