vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.7× JBG SMITH Properties). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -35.7%, a 41.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
JBGS vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
