vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.1× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 6.1%, a 23.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
KIM vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
