vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KENNAMETAL INC (KMT) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $592.6M, roughly 1.9× KENNAMETAL INC). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 10.3%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KENNAMETAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.8% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, KENNAMETAL INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Kennametal, Inc. is a manufacturer of high-performance cutting tools and engineered components used in the aerospace, defense, transportation and oil and gas drilling industries. Its customer base is global.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
KMT vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.6M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $61.1M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.3% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 85.0% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.75 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $592.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $529.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $498.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $516.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $486.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $482.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $543.3M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.6M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.2M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.30 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.47 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.8M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $597.4M | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.3M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.5M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.5M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.5M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.6M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.0M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $597.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $597.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $596.6M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.4M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $596.0M | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.49× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.1M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.6M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.8M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.2M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.6M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.1M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.9M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.3M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.64× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.08× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.06× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KMT
| Americas | $298.3M | 50% |
| EMEA | $174.0M | 29% |
| Asia Pacific | $120.3M | 20% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
