vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.1× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -20.7%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, KILROY REALTY CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
KRC vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $404.4M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-3.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $560.9M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $55.3M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
