vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Revolve Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.4M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.2× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 5.7%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Revolve Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.4% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $-13.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Revolve Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Revolve Theatre Company is a Henley-on-Thames based theatre company specialising in political and Shakespearean plays. The company is owned by Oliver Dench, Joe Morris and Tom Smith.
KRC vs RVLV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $324.4M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $18.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $324.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $295.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $293.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $283.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $282.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $270.6M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 54.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $292.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $512.5M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $765.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $292.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $315.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $310.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $300.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $256.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $252.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $244.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $273.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $512.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $490.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $468.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $453.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $437.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $420.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $405.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $389.9M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $765.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $751.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $722.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $713.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $670.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $657.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $650.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $-10.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $-13.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | -4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | -0.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $48.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $45.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $43.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | -0.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | 3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | -1.60× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 3.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
RVLV
| Fashion Apparel | $155.1M | 48% |
| Dresses | $76.4M | 24% |
| Handbags Shoes And Accessories | $67.6M | 21% |
| Beauty | $20.3M | 6% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $5.0M | 2% |
| Breakage On Store Credit And Gift Cards | $900.0K | 0% |
