vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $213.6M, roughly 1.3× Vital Farms, Inc.). Vital Farms, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 6.3%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vital Farms, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $-32.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Vital Farms, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.2% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Vital Tomosi Dairy Limited is a dairy processing company in Uganda. The company is a joint venture between Vital Capital Fund, "an impact investing fund primarily focused on Sub-Saharan Africa", and "Tomosi Dairy Farms, a Ugandan producer of dairy products".
KRC vs VITL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $213.6M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 54.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $198.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $184.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $162.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $147.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $147.9M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $16.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $48.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $351.3M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $518.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $93.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $108.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $156.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $150.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $113.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $351.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $331.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $309.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $269.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $238.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $213.3M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $518.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $481.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $430.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $376.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $359.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $344.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $320.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $300.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $-32.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | -15.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 17.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 0.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $-48.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $-761.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $22.6M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | -15.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 0.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
VITL
| Eggs And Egg Related Products | $205.8M | 96% |
| Butter And Butter Related Products | $7.7M | 4% |
