vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $613.3M, roughly 1.9× Kontoor Brands, Inc.). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs 4.3%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs 18.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
KTB vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $613.3M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $92.4M | $49.8M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 15.1% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.0% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 116.0% | 27.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.65 | $1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $613.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $631.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $92.4M | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | 53.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.65 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.4M | $303.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $618.9M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.85× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $56.4M | $248.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $779.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $618.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $387.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
