vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Liberty Broadband Corp (LBRDA) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Liberty Broadband Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($261.0M vs $213.6M, roughly 1.2× Vital Farms, Inc.). Liberty Broadband Corp runs the higher net margin — 146.7% vs 7.6%, a 139.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vital Farms, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 6.1%). Liberty Broadband Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.0M vs $-32.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Vital Farms, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.2% CAGR vs 4.3%).

Liberty Global Ltd. is a British-Dutch-American multinational telecommunications company domiciled in Bermuda, with headquarters in London, Amsterdam and Denver. Its respective legal names are Liberty Global Holdings Limited (UK), Liberty Global B.V. (Netherlands) and Liberty Global, Inc., with the first of these being publicly traded. It was formed in 2005 by the merger of the international arm of Liberty Media and UnitedGlobalCom (UGC).

Vital Tomosi Dairy Limited is a dairy processing company in Uganda. The company is a joint venture between Vital Capital Fund, "an impact investing fund primarily focused on Sub-Saharan Africa", and "Tomosi Dairy Farms, a Ugandan producer of dairy products".

LBRDA vs VITL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LBRDA
LBRDA
1.2× larger
LBRDA
$261.0M
$213.6M
VITL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VITL
VITL
+22.6% gap
VITL
28.7%
6.1%
LBRDA
Higher net margin
LBRDA
LBRDA
139.1% more per $
LBRDA
146.7%
7.6%
VITL
More free cash flow
LBRDA
LBRDA
$69.1M more FCF
LBRDA
$37.0M
$-32.1M
VITL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VITL
VITL
Annualised
VITL
20.2%
4.3%
LBRDA

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Revenue
$261.0M
$213.6M
Net Profit
$383.0M
$16.3M
Gross Margin
35.8%
Operating Margin
15.7%
10.0%
Net Margin
146.7%
7.6%
Revenue YoY
6.1%
28.7%
Net Profit YoY
96.4%
54.3%
EPS (diluted)
$2.68
$0.35

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$213.6M
Q3 25
$198.9M
Q2 25
$261.0M
$184.8M
Q1 25
$266.0M
$162.2M
Q4 24
$263.0M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$262.0M
$145.0M
Q2 24
$246.0M
$147.4M
Q1 24
$245.0M
$147.9M
Net Profit
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$16.3M
Q3 25
$16.4M
Q2 25
$383.0M
$16.6M
Q1 25
$268.0M
$16.9M
Q4 24
$291.0M
$10.6M
Q3 24
$142.0M
$7.4M
Q2 24
$195.0M
$16.3M
Q1 24
$241.0M
$19.0M
Gross Margin
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
35.8%
Q3 25
37.7%
Q2 25
38.9%
Q1 25
38.5%
Q4 24
36.1%
Q3 24
36.9%
Q2 24
39.1%
Q1 24
39.8%
Operating Margin
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
10.0%
Q3 25
10.8%
Q2 25
15.7%
12.9%
Q1 25
16.2%
13.4%
Q4 24
4.9%
7.8%
Q3 24
11.5%
6.4%
Q2 24
8.5%
11.6%
Q1 24
11.4%
16.3%
Net Margin
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
7.6%
Q3 25
8.3%
Q2 25
146.7%
9.0%
Q1 25
100.8%
10.4%
Q4 24
110.6%
6.4%
Q3 24
54.2%
5.1%
Q2 24
79.3%
11.1%
Q1 24
98.4%
12.9%
EPS (diluted)
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$0.35
Q3 25
$0.36
Q2 25
$2.68
$0.36
Q1 25
$1.87
$0.37
Q4 24
$2.04
$0.23
Q3 24
$0.99
$0.16
Q2 24
$1.36
$0.36
Q1 24
$1.69
$0.43

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$180.0M
$48.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$351.3M
Total Assets
$16.6B
$518.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$48.8M
Q3 25
$93.8M
Q2 25
$180.0M
$108.2M
Q1 25
$226.0M
$156.3M
Q4 24
$163.0M
$150.6M
Q3 24
$168.0M
$149.5M
Q2 24
$73.0M
$133.2M
Q1 24
$108.0M
$113.8M
Total Debt
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$3.1B
Q1 25
$3.8B
Q4 24
$3.8B
Q3 24
$3.7B
Q2 24
$3.6B
Q1 24
$3.6B
Stockholders' Equity
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$351.3M
Q3 25
$331.2M
Q2 25
$10.4B
$309.8M
Q1 25
$10.1B
$288.9M
Q4 24
$9.8B
$269.3M
Q3 24
$9.5B
$253.4M
Q2 24
$9.3B
$238.4M
Q1 24
$9.1B
$213.3M
Total Assets
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$518.7M
Q3 25
$481.5M
Q2 25
$16.6B
$430.8M
Q1 25
$17.0B
$376.9M
Q4 24
$16.7B
$359.3M
Q3 24
$16.3B
$344.7M
Q2 24
$16.0B
$320.5M
Q1 24
$15.7B
$300.2M
Debt / Equity
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.30×
Q1 25
0.38×
Q4 24
0.38×
Q3 24
0.39×
Q2 24
0.39×
Q1 24
0.40×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$91.0M
$5.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$37.0M
$-32.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.2%
-15.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
20.7%
17.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.24×
0.35×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-49.0M
$-48.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$5.8M
Q3 25
$23.4M
Q2 25
$91.0M
$-761.0K
Q1 25
$78.0M
$5.3M
Q4 24
$1.0M
$14.8M
Q3 24
$24.0M
$10.0M
Q2 24
$27.0M
$16.1M
Q1 24
$52.0M
$23.9M
Free Cash Flow
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$-32.1M
Q3 25
$-10.6M
Q2 25
$37.0M
$-7.6M
Q1 25
$13.0M
$2.1M
Q4 24
$-63.0M
$-3.4M
Q3 24
$-36.0M
$6.4M
Q2 24
$-35.0M
$10.5M
Q1 24
$-9.0M
$22.6M
FCF Margin
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
-15.1%
Q3 25
-5.3%
Q2 25
14.2%
-4.1%
Q1 25
4.9%
1.3%
Q4 24
-24.0%
-2.0%
Q3 24
-13.7%
4.4%
Q2 24
-14.2%
7.2%
Q1 24
-3.7%
15.3%
Capex Intensity
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
17.8%
Q3 25
17.1%
Q2 25
20.7%
3.7%
Q1 25
24.4%
1.9%
Q4 24
24.3%
10.9%
Q3 24
22.9%
2.5%
Q2 24
25.2%
3.8%
Q1 24
24.9%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
LBRDA
LBRDA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
0.35×
Q3 25
1.43×
Q2 25
0.24×
-0.05×
Q1 25
0.29×
0.31×
Q4 24
0.00×
1.40×
Q3 24
0.17×
1.34×
Q2 24
0.14×
0.99×
Q1 24
0.22×
1.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LBRDA
LBRDA

Segment breakdown not available.

VITL
VITL

Eggs And Egg Related Products$205.8M96%
Butter And Butter Related Products$7.7M4%

Related Comparisons