vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $226.2M, roughly 1.1× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 0.1%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 3.1%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
LC vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $226.2M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $180.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $212.9M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $158.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $742.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $332.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $512.2M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $631.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
